2010年12月英语六级?5、 英语六级考试15:40 开始做试题的第二部分 英语六级写作部分考试结束;考生打开试题册,开始做试题的第二部分“快速阅读理解”。6、 英语六级考试 15:55 收答题卡1 收卷期间考生不得答题,否则按违规违纪处理,并报省教育考试院处理。7、英语六级考试 16:00 听力考试正式开始。8、那么,2010年12月英语六级?一起来了解一下吧。
挺难的。听力比较难,后来看原文,原来自己根本没听懂。
完形也比较难,本人没看懂,也来不及看懂了。其他的难度还行。还能接受。
我觉得这套题最简单的就是翻译了。
作文没写完,悲剧啊!

考试时间2010年12月18日(周六)
大学英语四级考试:2010年12月18日上午9:00-11:20
大学英语六级考试:2010年12月18日下午15:00-17:20
即日起英语频道推出历年真题专题,为您提供四六级备考资料以及历年真题,请您密切关注下文《2010年12月英语六级真题》由英语频道为您整理,希望对您有帮助,欢迎您访问浏览更多考试资讯。
2010年12月大学英语六级考试真题
Part I Writing (30 minutes)
Direction: For this part, you are allowed 30 minutes to write a short essay entitled My Views on University Ranking. You should write at least 150 words following the outline given below.
1. 目前高校排名相当盛行;
2. 对于这种做法人们看法不一;
3. 在我看来……
My Views on University Ranking
Part II Reading Comprehension (Skimming and Scanning) (15 minutes)
Directions: In this part, you will have 15 minutes to go over the passage quickly and answer the questions on Answer Sheet 1. For questions 1-7, choose the best answer from the four choices marked [A], [B], [C] and [D]. For questions 8-10, complete the sentences with the information given in the passage.
Into the Unknown
The world has never seen population ageing before. Can it cope?
Until the early 1990s nobody much thought about whole populations getting older. The UN had the foresight to convene a “world assembly on ageing” back in 1982, but that came and went. By 1994 the World Bank had noticed that something big was happening. In a report entitled “Averting the Old Age Crisis”, it argued that pension arrangements in most countries were unsustainable.
For the next ten years a succession of books, mainly by Americans, sounded the alarm. They had titles like Young vs Old, Gray Dawn and The Coming Generational Storm, and their message was blunt: health-care systems were heading for the rocks, pensioners were taking young people to the cleaners, and soon there would be intergenerational warfare.
Since then the debate has become less emotional, not least because a lot more is known about the subject. Books, conferences and research papers have multiplied. International organisations such as the OECD and the EU issue regular reports. Population ageing is on every agenda, from G8 economic conferences to NATO summits. The World Economic Forum plans to consider the future of pensions and health care at its prestigious Davos conference early next year. The media, including this newspaper, are giving the subject extensive coverage.
Whether all that attention has translated into sufficient action is another question. Governments in rich countries now accept that their pension and health-care promises will soon become unaffordable, and many of them have embarked on reforms, but so far only timidly. That is not surprising: politicians with an eye on the next election will hardly rush to introduce unpopular measures that may not bear fruit for years, perhaps decades.
The outline of the changes needed is clear. To avoid fiscal (财政) meltdown, public pensions and health-care provision will have to be reined back severely and taxes may have to go up. By far the most effective method to restrain pension spending is to give people the opportunity to work longer, because it increases tax revenues and reduces spending on pensions at the same time. It may even keep them alive longer. John Rother, the AARP’s head of policy and strategy, points to studies showing that other things being equal, people who remain at work have lower death rates than their retired peers.
Younger people today mostly accept that they will have to work for longer and that their pensions will be less generous. Employers still need to be persuaded that older workers are worth holding on to. That may be because they have had plenty of younger ones to choose from, partly thanks to the post-war baby-boom and partly because over the past few decades many more women have entered the labour force, increasing employers’ choice. But the reservoir of women able and willing to take up paid work is running low, and the baby-boomers are going grey.
In many countries immigrants have been filling such gaps in the labour force as have already emerged (and remember that the real shortage is still around ten years off). Immigration in the developed world is the highest it has ever been, and it is making a useful difference. In still-fertile America it currently accounts for about 40% of total population growth, and in fast-ageing western Europe for about 90%.
On the face of it, it seems the perfect solution. Many developing countries have lots of young people in need of jobs; many rich countries need helping hands that will boost tax revenues and keep up economic growth. But over the next few decades labour forces in rich countries are set to shrink so much that inflows of immigrants would have to increase enormously to compensate: to at least twice their current size in western Europe’s most youthful countries, and three times in the older ones. Japan would need a large multiple of the few immigrants it has at present. Public opinion polls show that people in most rich countries already think that immigration is too high. Further big increases would be politically unfeasible.
To tackle the problem of ageing populations at its root, “old” countries would have to rejuvenate (使年轻) themselves by having more of their own children. A number of them have tried, some more successfully than others. But it is not a simple matter of offering financial incentives or providing more child care. Modern urban life in rich countries is not well adapted to large families. Women find it hard to combine family and career. They often compromise by having just one child.
And if fertility in ageing countries does not pick up? It will not be the end of the world, at least not for quite a while yet, but the world will slowly become a different place. Older societies may be less innovative and more strongly disinclined to take risks than younger ones. By 2025 at the latest, about half the voters in America and most of those in western European countries will be over 50—and older people turn out to vote in much greater number than younger ones. Academic studies have found no evidence so far that older voters have used their power at the ballot box to push for policies that specifically benefit them, though if in future there are many more of them they might start doing so.
Nor is there any sign of the intergenerational warfare predicted in the 1990s. After all, older people themselves mostly have families. In a recent study of parents and grown-up children in 11 European countries, Karsten Hank of Mannheim University found that 85% of them lived within 25km of each other and the majority of them were in touch at least once a week.
Even so, the shift in the centre of gravity to older age groups is bound to have a profound effect on societies, not just economically and politically but in all sorts of other ways too. Richard Jackson and Neil Howe of America’s CSIS, in a thoughtful book called The Graying of the Great Powers, argue that, among other things, the ageing of the developed countries will have a number of serious security implications.
For example, the shortage of young adults is likely to make countries more reluctant to commit the few they have to military service. In the decades to 2050, America will find itself playing an ever-increasing role in the developed world’s defence effort. Because America’s population will still be growing when that of most other developed countries is shrinking, America will be the only developed country that still matters geopolitically (地缘政治上).
Ask me in 2020
There is little that can be done to stop population ageing, so the world will have to live with it. But some of the consequences can be alleviated. Many experts now believe that given the right policies, the effects, though grave, need not be catastrophic. Most countries have recognised the need to do something and are beginning to act.
But even then there is no guarantee that their efforts will work. What is happening now is historically unprecedented. Ronald Lee, director of the Centre on the Economics and Demography of Ageing at the University of California, Berkeley, puts it briefly and clearly: “We don’t really know what population ageing will be like, because nobody has done it yet. “
注意:此部分试题请在答题卡1上作答。
说哪个好的话,我现在在意格英语,ABC先下英语,e线英语上.好.的,是外籍教师跟我1对1进行辅导授课,进步很多。010年福州中考时间为月1-0日 福州市中考原来的时间是月10-1日共天,但由于我省高中会考的时间是1、1日两天,存在时间冲突,在考点设置方面不利于招生部门开展工作。所以今年的中考时间推迟了天,到1日开始进行 010年福州市初中升学体育考试日程安排表 一、月日上午召开各县(市)区、各有关学校教务处相关负责人会议 二、月1、1日初中升学体育考试名时间(具体名流程于月10日公布) 三、月日身体残疾和丧失运动能力的城区考生,持相关文件到市教育局体卫艺处核准 月日有严重疾病不能参加体育考试的考生,持相关文件到市教育局体卫艺处核准 四、月日各有关单位派一名负责人,持介绍信到市教育局体卫艺处领取准考证 五、月1日—0日 八县(市)中考体育测试时间,月日-月10日市区中考体育测试时间 六、月日—日 各校向考生公布成绩,勘误、由考生签字确认,学校存档 七、月10日各校因临时伤病复考学生、B级以下再考考,名时间(网上名) 八、月11日缓考考生、B级以下再考考、回原籍考生、非应届考生,持介绍信领取准考证 九、月1日—1日缓考考生、B级以下再考考生、回原籍考生、非应届考生考试时间(具体考试地点于月日公布) 010年龙岩市中考考试时间及成绩记载方法有更改010年初中毕业、升学考试的时间将安排在月1日至1日进行,其中:思想品德(政治)、语文、数学、英语、物理、化学、历史考试时间安排在九年级结束时进行,即在010年月1日下午、0日、1日进行;生物、地理考试时间安排在八年级结束时进行,即在010年月1日上午进行。

2010年12月大学英语六级考试答案
快速阅读答案:
1-10ABDADBB take riskshave families military service
Part Ⅱ
Reading Comprehension(Skimming and Scanning)
1.A not be sustained in the long term
解析:关键字1994对应第一段第三行,题干中unsustainable即选项A中sustained的反义表达方式。选择A。
2.B Intergenerational conflicts will intensify.
解析:从书名定位到原文第二段,heading for the rock, the cleaner, 都暗示了两代人之间的问题,最后的warfare则一目了然地指出了该矛盾。
3.D politicians are afraid of losing votes in the next election
解析:首先需要理解题目意图,即为何养老机制改革迟迟不能进行,然后定位到文章第四段,其实只要从段落中politician这一关键字就能选定D选项。
4.A allow people to work longer
解析:从题干中the most effective method找到第五段第三句原话,直接选择A选项。

以上就是2010年12月英语六级的全部内容,2010年12月大学英语六级考试答案快速阅读答案:1-10ABDADBB take risks have families military servicePart ⅡReading Comprehension(Skimming and Scanning)1.A not be sustained in the long term解析:关键字1994对应第一段第三行,题干中unsustainable即选项A中sustained的反义表达方式。选择A。